Having grown up in a liberal family in the Netherlands I don’t know what it is like to struggle for my rights. I don’t know what it feels like to not be free simply because I am a woman, and I certainly don’t know what it is like to be a woman living under occupation.
Yesterday we, women, were celebrated around the world. Our rights, strength, uniqueness, and vital importance in our societies. In the occupied Gaza Strip and West Bank demonstrations were held in support of Hana’ Shalabi, a woman only several years older than me, held somewhere in an Israeli prison under so-called ‘administrative detention’. She does not know the reason for her detention and has not been (and will most likely not be) charged. In short: the Israeli occupation authorities found a loophole in international law – the same one (ab)used by the U.S. in Guantanamo – under which they can detain Palestinians indefinitely based on secret evidence, without charging them, as long as they claim to consider it “necessary, for imperative reasons of security”.[1]Shalabi, who whose brother was killed by the Israeli occupation army when it raided her village (Burqin, close to Jenin), had previously been kept in administrative detention for 25 months until her release in October 2011, being one of the prisoners who was exchanged for soldier Gilad Shalit. Hana’ spent less than 4 months with family and friends before being violently arrested from her village again. She was assaulted and strip searched during her arrest on 16 February. Protesting her detention and defending her dignity, she has not eaten since that day.In
the protest tent, set up in front of the headquarter of the ICRC in Gaza, a notebook was passed around in which people were asked to write a message for Hana’ Shalabi, who is being held in solitary confinement. To such a courageous woman one can only write words of respect, awe, and support. With all my heart, I hope she will sit in her home one day soon, reading through the pages people wrote to her.
After leaving the protest tent, I joined my female colleagues in a celebration of International Women’s Day. Towards the end of the relaxing afternoon a heated discussion erupted between them, about how (un)free women in the Gaza Strip are. Some of them said they cannot freely choose when to go out of the house, where to go, or even how to sit in a chair, without them and their families becoming the target of the community’s condemnation and gossip. Others -those living in the relatively wealthy and liberal Remal quarter in Gaza City- said it really wasn’t all that bad. ‘Not all of the Gaza Strip is like Remal!’was the logic response to that. Several of my colleagues, who do feel oppressed in their society in certain ways released their anger and frustration over restrictions and paternalizing patterns that are forced upon them. When talking about others’ interference with and control over their lives, one of the examples that came up was not being able to leave your house in the evening without your husband or a male relative. “I don’t have a brother or father, so what shoud I do then?” asked my colleague and friend in all her frustration. “Why would you need to go out late at night anyway?’ was someone’s reply. It became clear; what some experience as a form of oppression, is adopted by others as part of a perfectly normal life.
The same became obvious in the discussion following the screening of ‘Les ouvrières du monde’ in the French Cultural Centre. The documentary showed women in Belgium, Indonesia and Turkey, working under exploitative conditions in Levi’s factories. After that the rights of working women and women in general in Palestinian society were discussed. “Everything is in the interest of the woman”, was one of the first comments made, by one of the men attending. I guess this relates to the (prescribed) men’s responsibility in providing for the family income and ensure the wellbeing of his wife and children. Someone else added: “Several decades ago the women were worse off. A couple of decades ago the women couldn’t leave the house alone. Before that they weren’t even allowed to open the front door. Now that is different and rules are necessary. All girls have mobile phones nowadays; that creates risks.” When a colleague and friend of mine asked about a 14-year old girl’s capability to give consent to a marriage (sharia’ law sets 14 years as the age limit) the only Palestinian woman in the audience answered her. “I don’t know if such a young girl can give full consent but I at least we have a better system than societies where there are so many single mothers who have to take care of their children alone. After I worked in a pharmacy for 7 years –which I found hard work- my husband married me and now he is taking care of me. He knows the work was tiring me and now I don’t have to work. I am happy as a woman.”
I know women in Gaza who have to struggle for their right to work; they want to do something in society but face obstacles as most people expect them to get married and stay at home to take care of the children and household. Again, what one woman might experience as paternalizing and oppressive, is a caring and loving relationship for someone else.
All cultural, traditional, religious and personal views aside, one thing holds true: there are no excuses for women’s rights violations, but there is no doubt that occupation is an incredibly destructive power affecting every singly fibre of a society; from family life to food security, and from mental health to women’s rights. It is no rocket science: oppression becomes internalized and stress and insecurity creates domestic violence. For the Palestinian society and Palestinian women to really flourish, the decades of dispossession, displacement, colonization, and army violence must end, for an occupied mind is never really free.
[1] Article 78 Fourth Geneva Convention.


Jan Hamer
March 9, 2012
Palestine? Waar ligt dat? Kan het op geen enkele atlas vinden.
Frank Kahn
March 9, 2012
Thank you for another excellent Update! Be well my dear!
Victor
March 10, 2012
Beste Jan Hamer,
Klopt helemaal.
Israelmaakt zijn eigen landkaarrten. Dat doe je als je gebieden illegaal bezet houdt.
Judith
March 16, 2012
Palestina bestond nooit als land. Iedereen die beweerd van wel dient zich eens een boek aan te schaffen over de geschiedenis van het Midden-Oosten.
De naam gaven de Romeinen aan dit gebied na de Bar Kochba-opstand in 135 tegen de Romeinse overheersing om de Joden te vernederen. De naam diende hen te herinneren aan de Filistijnen die door de Joden waren verslagen. Hadrianus veranderde de naam Provincia Judaea in Provincia Syria Palaestina, later afgekort tot het Engelse Palestine.
Palestina was geen land, was een gebied dat onderdeel was van o.a. het Romeinse Rijk, het Ottomaanse, net zoals De Achterhoek in Nederland. Om Palestina een land te noemen is net zo’n kolder als een regio in Nederland een land te noemen.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/revolt1.html
Als Palestina ooit een land geweest ou zijn had het een eigen wetgeving gehad, eigen munten, een eigen taal, zou iemand die beweerd dat Palestina een land was moeten kunnen aangeven wanneer deze staat gesticht zou zijn, wat de hoofdstad is, de grenzen lagen, de civilisatie zou zijn enz. De Israëlische staat was een feit in 1312 v. Christus en bestond dus al ruim 2000 jaar voor de islam opkwam.
Ergo, Palestijnen bestaan niet. Het was Zahir Muhsein die toegaf dat het bestaan van een Palestijns volk alleen daarom de wereld werd ingebracht om de Joden uit het gebied weg te werken.
http://www.vibrani.com/Palestinians.htm
De reden waarom Arabieren voortdurend archeologische vindplaatsen vernielen is om te voorkomen dat alleen Joodse artefacten te voorschijn komen en nooit ook maar iets dat te maken heeft met de islam of ‘Palestijnen’. Arabieren kunnen niets anders doen dan voortdurend de geschiedenis vervalsen en andere culturen vernielen. Daarom wordt alles vernield, verbrand en de geschiedenis herschreven, dus vervalst om uitvinden toe te kunnen schrijven aan moslims, beter, de islam.
Jordanië ontstond in 1946 uit het Britse rijk nadat de Turken waren verslagen, Syrië ontstond in 1946, Irak ontstond in 1932. Kosovo is een provincie van Servië maar de Albanezen meenden dit te kunnen opeisen omdat zij een meerderheid waren onder de Serven.
Al dit zijn feiten die onveranderlijk zijn maar wel vervalst kunnen worden en dat is wat moslims en socialisten/politiek correcten gaar doen.